The title of this post does NOT suggest that any evidence exists of Babylon 5 coming to Blu-Ray.
Only that it should.
B5 broke new ground in its day, breaking from the Star Trek establishment by blasting a sci-fi series onto the screen that blended speculative contemplation, mystical philosophy, long-term character development, conspiracy, heroism, betrayal, cutting-edge creative effects and wicked, wicked forehead jobs.
The original airing of the pilot episode featured puming electric guitars in a rocking score by Steve Copeland (of The Police fame), later retconned to the orchestral stylings of the series’ composer Christopher Franke.
The show was thrilling. Political intrigue, thought-provoking concepts of science and mysticism, entwining and unfolding destinies and most of all, to the young nerd that was me at the age of fourteen, the logistics of travel, habitation, trade, peacekeeping and ultimately warfare in space.
Yes, the sound sucked. Yes, the sets were a little on the hokey side, but you know what? A recent re-watching of the series showed that they held up impressively under the exacting standards of my adult eyes, accustomed to the glories of Firefly and Battlestar Galactica.
But the CGI on the DVDs is terrible, terrible. Gather ‘round, children, and hear the sad tale we call the Tragedy of Babylon 5.
J. Michael Straczynski, Joe to his friends, worked tirelessly to get B5 onto the screen and would later perform a Herculean feat unmatched in television history before or since, penning all the scripts for a 22-episode season solo. The man was a visionary, brilliant not only in his own creativity, but his ability to enthuse and nurture other talens (including established ones like ‘creative consultant’ Harlan Ellison) and to dance with light-footed grace around the perils of television production.
An actor decides to leave the show before completing their character’s intended four-season arc? No problem. Straczynski had a trap door ready, a plausible plot twist that could drop the character, plus a clever reinterpretation of past events that would let a different character fulfill the intended role.
Visionary that he was, he could also see that television in the future would be different from 1993. The DVD Consortium was hotly and noisily debating the digital media of tomorrow, and the benefits of 16:9 widescreen were so obvious that television would definitely one day embrace it.
So up he came with a cunning plan. “Let me film it in widescreen,” he said. “We’ll compose the shots so they can be cropped to 4:3, but then at least we’ll have widescreen footage which we can use on the DVDs.”
The studio’s nostrils throbbed. “But what of the special effects you’ve budgeted? Wider screens at higher resolutions cost significatnly more computing power.” Ah yes, there’s the rub. Why would anyone spend that extra money for a benefit that wouldn’t be felt for half a decade at least?
Straczynski planned for the future. “When the time comes to make DVDs,” he said, cackling with snotty glee, “computers will be more powerful by an order of magnitude. They’ll be able to render all the CGI we need at DVD resolution in a fraction of the time it takes us to produce it for VHS. Think of it! With only a small investment in ten years’ time, you’ll be able to market the series as a whole new experience!”
And wouldn’t that have been nice, children?
Wouldn’t it have been nice if poor management, poor archival practices and the dissolution of the VFX houses that produced the effects for B5 hadn’t resulted in the utter annihilation of the graphic assets that could have been used to re-render the CGI?
Look at the B5 DVDs. The footage is crisp and detailed, but as soon as a space-ship comes into view it turns to shit. Blurry, knobbly, even with some weird prismatic haloing around the jagged edges.
Being unable to re-render the graphics they had no choice but to take the VHS tapes of the computer effects, which were already of lower resolution and quality than DVD by far, and then cut the top and bottom to narrow it down to widescreen.
Now, if the studio wanted to put B5 out on Blu-Ray, they would have to start all the graphics from scratch. They don’t even have any archives of any of the CGI models — the shot of a Minbari ship in the straight-to-DVD Lost Tales set was only possible because nerdy fans had independently created a model of the ship and provided it to the producers.
Would that be so bad, though?
Think of it. The studio has that most precious of resources: camera negatives. Can you imagine what that would look like, digitized with modern equipment, graded to modern standards, and then bolstered by brand-new, far-less hokey CGI?
I know, I know. I sound like George Lucas. But stick with me.
B5 made its limitations work. Straczynski’s production team struck a brilliant balance between quantity and quality: the sets were small, but that was made plausible because on a space station, habitable space is at a premium. Of course you’d make all your workspaces as compact as possible. And as a result, they could build a huge variety of exciting locations in a limited amount of studio space.
Likewise the CGI. Yes, it wasn’t convincing, but it was awesome — literally, awe-inspiring. Space-ships obeyed Newtonian physics (or at least, the ones that were bound by them). The designs were inventive and spoke volumes abuot the species’ culture and psychology.
The series, for all its weird little silliness here and there, is a treasure of ingenuity and richly deserves to be refashioned. Who’s with me!
Before & After: this is why I shoot RAW.
Left is the camera original JPEG, right is what I uploaded to Flickr.
How could I have missed this? Travis Ratledge (@rudderbutt)’s haunting cover of Adele’s “Someone like you” with accompaniment from @foxamoore and gorgeous videography by @steveflavin.
Isn’t he just dreamy? Sigh…
Brb, buying all his music on iTunes.
http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/someone-like-you-feat.-ryan/id474048302
American color photos from 1939-1943.
Hats galore, terrible haircuts, and stunning imagery. We’re so used to seeing this period in history in black and white; seeing this world in color, in daylight, is mighty keen.
(via Captured: America in Color from 1939-1943 – Plog Photo Blog)
Source: The Denver Post
Scot Zellman, artist extraordinaire of Buster Wilde fame, has opende a catalog of cool design swag. Check it.
I like the Buster Wilde iPad cover :)
http://society6.com/Zellhound/Buster-Wilde-Weerwolf_Print
(via Buster Wilde Weerwolf Art Print by Zellhound | Society6)
Source: society6.com
My new favorite blog ever (today). “Magic cards with googley eyes.” Thanks Astolpho!
Source: magiccardswithgooglyeyes
Android fragmentation is real.
Great research by Michael Degusta.
When you buy an iPhone, you’re Apple’s customer and they’re committed to supporting you and your device. You will receive firmware updates in pace with all other customers, barring some features which your device can’t support, for at least three years after the device’s introduction.
Not so for Android users. From the data available, anyone who buys an android device has no reasonable expectation of enjoying the benefits of future updates in a timely fashion - or at all.
Apple’s been accused of encouraging users to buy new versions of their products by loading the new ones with features that the old ones are denied. That’s totally fair: it’s called a product upgrade cycle. What’s the ponit of introducing a new product if it isn’t better than the previous one?
But look at the chart. Look at the staggering number of Android devices that have never been up to date. Or moe laughably, which were up to date for only a few weeks of their lifecycle. Most were running out of date software at the time of their launch, and never caught up.
And few of the Android devices displayed have enjoyed official support for more than ten months.
When Ice Cream Sandwich was announced, which percentage of the current Android installed base was certain they would be able to update their phone to ICS? And how many of those could expect a timely update, rather than a several-month delay?
It’s shameful, but who’s to blame? Not Google. They never made a commitment to end-users; their ‘customers’ are handset makers who license Android. And those handset makers? They sell their phones to carriers, not to end users. And the carriers created neither the hardware nor the software, they only sell the product as-is, so how can they be expected to provide updates to their customers?
Android users get what they buy at the time they buy it and shouldn’t rationally expect future updates like iPhone customers do. Considering Android’s impressive market share, apparently a lot of people don’t care if they’re running outdated firmware. So that works out fine.
As of this month, 38% of currently operating Android devices are running version 2.3, the most recent version, introduced in 2010. Ten months ago.
iOS 5 was introduced on October 12 and within five days, 1 in 3 iOS devices was running 5.0.
If you were an app developer, what would this mean for you?
If you develop for iOS and a new version comes out, you can reasonably expect most of your customers to be using the new version within three to six months. So you’re encouraged to focus your efforts on the exciting new functions of the new OS.
If you develop for Android, any new OS update will take over a year to reach the majority of your potential customers. And that’s largely because so many new customers are buying into Android, rather than because existing customers can upgrade.
This doesn’t mean that Android innovation is lagging, neither in the OS nor the apps.
It means, however, that fragmentation rules the Android culture. Those who can run the New Shit on their devices, those that might some day get to enjoy it, and those that never will. App developers who are willing to target the cutting-edge minority of Android users by exploiting the New Shit to its full potential, and developers who stick to the lowest common denominator to serve as many customers as possible.
Android fragmentation is real.
Source: understatementblog
This should totally be called scizzula: pizza-cutting scissors with integrated spatula.
On first glance it’s ridiculous, but doesn’t it seem just a teenie bit useful?
(via Amazon.com: PIZZA SCISSORS / SPATULA - CUT n SERVE Stainless Steel: Kitchen & Dining)
Source: amazon.com
The fridge of the future!
Cute concept, but it completely ignores the existence of mobile devices such as phones and tablets which can already perform most of these tasks (except of course for directly sensing what food is in the fridge).
I like how vapid and helpless the lady seems, sort of waving her finger while waiting for her fridge to make decisions for her.
In MY Fridge (by fabian kreuzer)
Source: vimeo.com
PRONTO: the fastest way to get it on. Brilliant condom wrapper design affords speedy and convenient raincoat application.
Source: getitonpronto.com










